What makes up the real cost of certification?
Four blocks, plus expenses that only a gap analysis reveals. The certification body’s quote is only one part of it, and rarely the heaviest. The table shows who receives each payment and what makes it vary.
Item | Paid to | Mandatory? | What makes it vary |
|---|---|---|---|
Certification, surveillance and recertification audits | The certification body | Yes | Audit time, number of sites, travel, standard |
Consultancy | The consultancy or the consultant | No | Starting point, share of the work entrusted, deadline |
Internal time | Your employees, in working hours | Yes | Availability of the project manager and process owners, maturity of the system |
Training | A training provider, or your in-house trainers | In practice, yes: standards require demonstrated competence | Number of participants, sessions and languages |
Works and equipment | Your suppliers | Depending on the gaps found | Condition of premises, equipment and installations |
Testing and calibration | Laboratories | Depending on the standard and your monitoring plan | Products, hazards, frequencies |
Reference texts | The standard’s publisher | Yes, to work on the text | ISO standards are paid for; IFS publishes its standard as a download on its website |
These items do not go to the same people, and that is deliberate. The certification body pays for its own accreditation, whose fees SEMAC (Service Marocain d’Accréditation, the Moroccan Accreditation Service) sets in a notice from the Ministry of Industry and Trade (in French), and signs a contract with the scheme owner where there is one. The consultant, for its part, has no financial link with the body: our guide consultant vs certification body: who does what explains why.
What does the certification body invoice, and under which rules?
Audit days, calculated under written rules, over a whole certification cycle. A body’s price is therefore compared first on audit time, then on the daily rate and travel costs.
For ISO quality, environmental and occupational health and safety standards, audit time is calculated under Global ACI-TECH-3-004, version 1.0 of 10 July 2026, which carries over IAF MD 5 (Global ACI has taken over the role of the International Accreditation Forum). The starting point is the number of people within the scope, adjusted for the risk of the activity, the sites, outsourced activities and languages. For a combined audit of several standards, Global ACI-TECH-3-008 adds up the audit times standard by standard and caps the reduction for integration at 20%.
For food safety standards, each scheme owner sets its own rules. FSSC 22000 Version 7 requires the audit duration calculation to be uploaded to its Assurance Platform for every audit and counts in three-year certification cycles. IFS Food Version 8 requires a full audit every year and writes the audit duration into the contract between the site and the body.
Two items often come as a surprise. The first is unannounced audits, which some standards require or offer: their cost lies less in the invoice than in the obligation to be ready every day. The second is failure, which has a direct cost.
- Denying the auditor access. Under the IFS Food Version 8 standard, a site that denies access during an unannounced audit, apart from force majeure, has its certificate withdrawn within a maximum of two working days, and the body invoices it for the total cost of the audit.
- A critical nonconformity at the initial audit. Under the FSSC 22000 Version 7 scheme, the audit is then failed and the full certification audit must be repeated.
The factors specific to each standard are detailed in our articles on the cost of ISO 9001, BRCGS, IFS Food and FSSC 22000 certification.
What do you pay the consultant for, and when can you do without one?
Consultant days, on site, remote and in training, plus expenses. Consultancy is optional: BRCGS presents it as a step to take “if needed”, and a company with an experienced quality manager can run a project alone and simply bring in an external mock audit. Consultancy earns its place when time, audit experience or competence on a standard is lacking, or when a customer imposes a short deadline.
The factors that move these fees, and the billing models (fixed price per phase, time and materials, retainer), are detailed in our article on ISO consultancy fees. One rule applies whatever the standard: the consultant’s price never includes the certification audit.
Why is your teams’ time often the largest item?
Because the system lives through your teams, and the standards require it of them. BRCGS Food Safety Issue 9 allows external expertise, but states that the day-to-day management of the food safety systems remains the responsibility of the company (clause 1.2.4 of the self-assessment checklist, French version).
That time is spread across several functions:
- the project manager, who steers the schedule and arbitrates;
- top management, which sets the policy, objectives and resources, and holds the management review;
- process owners, who write or approve their documents and produce the records;
- internal auditors, trained and then deployed over a full cycle;
- operators, trained and interviewed on audit day.
Handing all the drafting to the consultant cuts this time at the start, then makes you pay for it at the audit: the auditor questions your process owners and operators, not the consultant. Put this time in your budget, even though no invoice comes with it.
What can be funded, and how do you avoid paying twice?
Training, not consultancy or the audit. In Morocco, training actions written into the training plan can be reimbursed under the special training contracts (contrats spéciaux de formation, CSF) of OFPPT, the national vocational training office, at a reference rate of 70% for planned training delivered by an external provider and 40% for unplanned training, within a ceiling linked to the vocational training tax (taxe de formation professionnelle, TFP) the company has declared. A rate is not an amount: our CSF and GIAC funding page offers an indicative simulation, before ceilings and with no commitment. These rules are those of the CSF procedures manual of May 2006 (in French), amended by its Amendment No. 2 of 2 June 2014. For a company based outside Morocco, these mechanisms do not apply.
The biggest waste, however, is not a poorly funded item: it is a certification that has to be redone. It happens when the standard does not suit the buyer, or when the body is not entitled to issue the certificate. Our case study of an exporter whose certificate was rejected shows its price in time and in markets.